3 Comments

  1. Andy Sullivan

    Bill,

    As a commander/ministry director I decided to wait until the upcoming year (2017/18) to start using the new curriculum for two reasons. 1. Because we still had quite a few 1st books left over from the older material. 2. I also felt that my wife and I would be able to observe the feedback, both positive and not so positive.

    I think if we as leadership are open to growing ourselves we will be open to new ideas for our clubbers. Like my grandfather always taught me, if you want to grow, and you are teachable, you can learn something from everyone you meet.

    I’m not sure which way to adapt the new curriculum for our program yet. We have a relatively small Awana Club program. We have had Puggles in the past, however this year we didn’t have any children that age to have the Puggles club. This year we only had Cubbies, Sparks, & T&T clubs at our church, with a total of 50 clubbers. With us having 30 or less clubbers each week for T&T I don’t think it would work for us to have Large group times for each book as I have heard suggested for this new program. We will more than likely still have a combined large group program for T&T with both boys and girls together.

    Andy Sullivan

  2. Jerald Dent

    Two concerns(of several): First, kids don’t want to do the homework part. They have plenty from school every day. Adding this is making club “homework” instead of scripture memory, prasie/worship and fun. Second is if a kiddo doesn’t finish their book they don’t ever finish because next year they have to buy the next one to stay with their friends. Parents see that as wasteful.

  3. David Porter

    Bill,

    Some of the benefits that we saw at our club this year.

    1. All T&T leaders had a sense of what the topic and learning point of the evening was.

    2. There was time to engage with each clubber, not just those who came prepared. We had clubbers who would do nothing at home. But we could still discuss Explore questions and hear from each other after LG Group and then work on Memory. In years past those kids were silent and ignored as leaders focused on clubbers who had sections ready.

    3. Clubbers who started mid-year had a glide path that brought them into conversation with rest of the group. No more you are only there, I did that 3 months ago comments from kids.

    Difficulties we saw:
    1. Fast track was not effective for our club.

    2. As noted parents viewed Explore as more “homework” and they had enough

    3. When a leader had to leave mid-year the transition was rocky with subs or replacements. (We needed to do better training midyear as our training was all front loaded.)

    4. For those that did it properly incentivizing the silver and gold material.

Comments are closed.